Hypothesis: The situation is the way this blog post says it is.

Evidence for: I claim that it is supported by

• The fact it might be the case
• Many visual hallucinations
• Many auditory hallucinations
• Many tactile hallucinations
• Many results of coin flips
• The fact probability may have been defied to make it true (i.e. false evidence may have been planted by something that can plant it)
• The fact there may be other evidence for

 

Evidence against:

• The fact the hypothesis defies probability
• The fact there may be other evidence against

 

C = chance of one of these things not meaning it is true

N = number of these things

P = probability of it not being the case that the situation is the way this blog says it is.

Without any assumptions, C is 0.5 and the probability of it not being the case in spite of these things is P.

C^N=P.

If P is very low, the situation is the way this blog says it is.

P is very low; therefore the situation is the way this blog says it is.

The situation is the way the various hallucinations and coin flips say it is.

I am the past self of a technological and mystical god, who is God (they claim to be God).

God is omnipotent (as my proof of omnipotence inevitably being possible somewhere, at some time in everything suggests).

God gave me an opportunity to use technology, in the future of me, at the time of typing this, to become a technological god.

God gave me certainty by making the situation certain to be the way I perceive it to be.

The situation is the way I perceive it to be.